This post is based on a debate proposed for the subject Intercultural Management in Universidad EAFIT. The question is which nation will be the top nation in 2025, China or India?
I decided to focus on education since it is not hard to identify a high correlation in different countries between wealth and levels of education. Thus, in this area, it is well-known how India has developed a growth system based on education bringing amazing levels of productivity, but what is not as noticeable is the more organized and planned education system China has been developing especially since the end of the Cultural Revolution in 1976.
As a first comparison, India educates approximately 10% of its university-age population, while China about 22%. China is now number one in enrolments, with more than 27 million. India’s 13 million enrolment ranks third. For almost two decades China has been engaged in upgrading the quality of its top universities and expanding enrolments in all higher education sectors, while India has also recognized the importance of increasing education access and improving quality, but only recently have allocated significant resources with the Knowledge Commission’s recommendations of 2006 and more recent government commitments. China has implemented an international education policy since 2000 and India is debating its approach to international higher education. The multifaceted policy of China includes aggressive plans to attract international students to the country and that’s why many Chinese universities have expanded their campus facilities for international students. As an example, Confucius Institutes, now numbering more than 292 with plans for 1,000 by 2025, provide Chinese cultural programs on universities worldwide. India’s international efforts lag behind those of China. In 2008, approximately 20,000 international students studied in India, most of them from South Asia, Africa, and the Indian Diaspora and few Indian universities have either facilities or staff for international students. Although there is a potential for India because much of the higher education in English, without significant investment in infrastructure and a coherent policy, Indian initiatives are unlikely to succeed. In terms of access, the government has the objective of expanding access to 15% in 2012 and 21% in 2017. China is approaching mass access. In 2005, the minister of education indicated that the participation rate would be 40% by 2020.
In terms of equity, many of the top universities of China have regional quotas so applicants from all the country can access. From the beginning of the People’s Republic, China has dedicated considerable attention to inequalities by encouraging expansion of access in western China although major inequalities persist. The most controversial issues in Indian higher education include the selection of policies aimed at improving access and equity for tribal groups, lower castes, and dalits. This is a critical socio-cultural aspect becoming a limitation in this field; this is the “positive discrimination”
Much progress is needed in both limited systems, but what I expect from the existing trend is a more culturally and economically developed long time oriented China with time perspective and attitudes of persevering looking for international approaches than India without a coherent, differentiated academic scheme and identified strategy for moving toward a system approach.
To give another argument I decided to expose The World Bank’s report called “Doing Business measuring business regulations” which provides a quantitative measure of regulations for starting a business, dealing with construction permits, employing workers, registering property, getting credit, protecting investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and closing a business as they apply to domestic small and medium-size enterprises. I decided to select the five aspects I considered as the most important for all what is related with doing a business in a country. Although India shows a better situation in terms of protecting investors, the index is not really far from China’s and we can notice that China have an advantage in terms of costs for almost all the aspects. In an effort to unify all the aspects being analyzed in this report, The World Bank exhibits the Economy Rankings where countries are ranked on their ease of doing business, from 1 to 183, with first place being the best. A high ranking on the ease of doing business index means the regulatory environment is conducive to the operation of business. Is in this ranking where we can find China in 89th place and India in 133rd place. I consider this research an important guide for understanding the situation in every country in terms of facilities for developing business and at the same time it helps to establish a framework to answer the initial question of the top nation by 2025 being China the state that offers nowadays more characteristics for future economic growth.
DOING BUSINESS IN CHINA AND INDIA
Click on the image to extend it.
References:
Altbach, P.. (2009). One-third of the globe: The future of higher education in China and India. Prospects, 39(1), 11-31. Retrieved March 10, 2010, from ProQuest Education Journals. (Document ID: 1897715041).
The World Bank Group (2010). Doing Business Measuring business regulations. Doing Business. Retrieved March 21, 2010 from:
http://www.doingbusiness.org/
The World Bank Group (2010). Doing Business Measuring business regulations. Doing Business. Retrieved March 21, 2010 from:
http://www.doingbusiness.org/economyrankings/